Game 1: Bruins 3, Rangers 2

Brief thoughts on the B’s second-straight overtime playoff win:

  • Absolute OT domination The Bruins owned the overtime period so thoroughly that, logically, I thought they’d lose on some fluke goal. Truthfully, that overtime may be the best extended stretch of play by the Bruins this season (it can be argued that the last eleven minutes of Game 7 vs. Toronto was better, I suppose). It’s important to not read too much into it, but fatigue shouldn’t have been any more a factor for the Rangers than for the Bruins. The Rangers won 5-0 in Game 7, whereas the B’s need a historic comeback and overtime to win. What set the tone for the overtime was the B’s early power play, one which saw them record EIGHT shots on goal. They didn’t score, but they did create a whole bunch of momentum, and they never gave it up. Impressive.
  • Youngsters impress It’s hard not to gush about the play of Torey Krug and Matt Bartkowski (and to a lesser extent, because he has played far more, Dougie Hamilton). Rather than being inexperienced liabilities on the blueline, each has added an element of speed and vision to what is mostly a stay-at-home unit. I honestly don’t remember the last Bruin defenseman who moved as well as Krug and Bartkowski do. The B’s have been looking for a puck-mover on the back end for years now, and it appears that they may have two of them.
  • Coaches impress as well Perhaps equally impressive is the treatment Claude Julien and the coaching staff gave to Bartkowski and Krug before the game, essentially telling each to play the game that got him here, i.e. don’t be conservative or scared just because you’re not in Providence. It would’ve been easy for the coaching staff to play each sheltered minutes, and encourage each to make safe plays. Instead, the coaches essentially took the shackles off and said “do your thing.” It worked out perfectly.
  • Chara is a monster It’s hard to actually put into words how immense Zdeno Chara has been in the past two games. The captain has skated 73:48 TOI in the past two games alone. Nearly 74 minutes!!! He’s riding a five-game point streak, had two points last night, was a plus-2, and fired nine shots on goal. Chara may honestly be playing the best hockey of his Bruin career right now, and it’s a treat to watch.
  • Speaking of a treat to watch… David Krejci is in one of his zones, and is playing on another level right now. He’s making some incredible plays with the puck, his vision is unbelievable, and he’s keeping turnovers to a minimum.
  • Tortorella Jerk Report Around 100 seconds. What a guy.
Posted in Game Recaps | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Game 3: Bruins 5, Leafs 2

Keeping it short, here are some thoughts on last night’s win:

  • Timely saves They don’t get much more timely than the 18 stops Tuukka Rask made in the third period last night. Rask has always played well in Toronto (4-1-0 in five career decisions, according to Yahoo! Sports), but was immense last night. He withstood Toronto’s third period barrage in cool, calm Tuukka fashion, and made plenty of those “timely saves” Claude Julien has been talking about all year. Rask didn’t have an awful Game 2, but he looked determined to bounce back last night, and did so in impressive fashion.
  • Top line rollin’ The Milan Lucic- David Krejci – Nathan Horton continues to roll, adding eight more points (combined) last night. It’s hard to say who is driving the bus here: on the one hand, it could be Lucic moving his feet and creating space for Krejci; on the other hand, it could be Krejci’s creativity that’s creating time and space for Lucic to do his thing. Whatever the case may be, the B’s a reaping the benefits of stellar play by that trio.
  • Secondary scoring comes through It was nice to see the Bruins get some offensive production from guys outside of the top six last night. Daniel Paille, Adam McQuaid, and Rich Peverley all tallied, and the B’s are at their most dangerous when all four lines are rolling. The third line has been a bit of a momentum-killer at times in this series, but they got going pretty well last night. Let’s hope they can keep it up.
  • Great crowd The crowd at the Air Canada Centre was fantastic last night, with the exception of the “Toronto Stronger” morons. Leafs fans are passionate, but the ACC has a reputation as being a bit of an elitist building, where stuffy suits occupy the lower bowl and don’t make much noise. That wasn’t the case last night, as the entire arena was jumping from before the puck dropped. It’s great to see such passion on display.
Posted in Game Recaps | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Game 1: Bruins 4, Leafs 1

Some quick thoughts on last night’s thumping:

  • Really, this was pretty much a perfect start by the Bruins. Sure, they allowed a goal. But they controlled the game for 58 of the 60 minutes, scored four times (five if you want to count Bergeron’s waved-off goal), and generally outworked the Leafs in every aspect of the game. They didn’t take any dumb penalties (I’m looking at you, Colton Orr), shut down Phil Kessel, planted plenty of seeds of doubt in James Reimer’s had, and had some Leafs fans on Twitter acting like the series was already over. The B’s couldn’t have done much better last night.
  • With that said, let’s not get carried away: the series is far from over. Fans need only look to last year, when the B’s won their first game against the Caps, only to eventually lose the series. The playoffs are a difficult beast to figure out, but it was good to see the B’s come out firing on all cylinders.
  • I’ve often referred to Milan Lucic as the engine that drives the B’s. While that may be true, it’s grown more clear that David Krejci has just as much sway over the Bruins’ success. Krejci was in perfect “playoff Krejci” form last night, creating plenty of opportunities for himself and his teammates. If he keeps it up, he’ll eventually elevate Lucic and Nathan Horton’s play as well, making that top line dangerous.
  • Goaltending has been the Leafs’ biggest issue for the better part of a decade now, and while James Reimer was terrific this year, goaltending was one of their major issues last night. Reimer whiffed on Johnny Boychuk’s slapshot from the point, left his legs open on Krejci’s goal, and mishandled Wade Redden’s shot on the B’s first goal, a shot that, in Reimer’s defense, may have hit a Leaf on the way in. This isn’t to say that the loss was Reimer’s fault; rather that his play can’t have done much to convince Leafs brass and fans that the days of goaltending questions are over. I expect Reimer to bounce back and have a solid series, but his start has to be a bit disheartening.
  • The fourth line deserves a lot of credit for turning the tide last night, with a tremendous shift that hemmed the Leafs in their own end for the better part of two minutes. That trio hasn’t been as solid this year as in the recent past, but it was in vintage form last night. That’s a good sign for the B’s, as having a fourth line that can actually play (looking at you again, Colton Orr) is an advantage the B’s have over the Leafs.
  • I think Ference will probably end up getting suspended for a game for his hit to the head of Mikhail Grabovski. Argue all you want as to whether or not it was an elbow or a shoulder; it doesn’t matter. The hit was to the head. The principal point of contact was the head. Ference is a repeat offender (the Ryan McDonagh hit a year or so ago, and the “glove malfunction” too). I think he’ll get sat down for Game 2. That means Dougie Hamilton may get his shot. A big game from Dougie would likely send Leafs fans over the edge. Thank you, Kessel, indeed.
Posted in Game Recaps | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

An unimaginable tragedy

Yesterday started off about as perfectly as a day can. I took the train into work because I’d be taking it right to the Garden after work to go to the B’s game with my brother, father, and uncle, something we’ve turned into a sort of yearly tradition around their birthdays at the end of March.

It was a perfect Marathon Monday: not as hot as it was last year, but not cold and rainy either. I was a half hour early for work, and spent that time sitting out in the sun reading The Iliad (nerd alert, I know).

It was a normal Monday for me too: I spent the morning making Bruins jokes on Twitter, polishing up the Bruins Bracket for Cup of Chowder, and helping people with resumes and computer stuff. It was all normal, until everything changed with one click of the mouse.

“XX new Tweets,” and suddenly my screen was filled with reports of bombs going off at the Boston Marathon. “What the hell?” was my first reaction, a mixture of confusion, fear, and disbelief. As the afternoon wore on, it became far too real:

Someone had bombed my home.

I’ve lived in Boston my entire life. I grew up in Dorchester and attended college at Suffolk University, where I lived on campus for two years. During those two years, the entire downtown/Back Bay area was my playground. I’d thought nothing of walking down to Boylston Street after class to pick up a copy of NHL08 (dating myself here, wow), grabbing lunch at the Pour House, or heading to Newbury Street to laugh at the pretentious people browsing the high-end stores.

For those who don’t know, Patriots Day is a uniquely Boston holiday: the Red Sox play at 11 in the morning, after which fans head to Kenmore Square to watch the runners stream through; tens of thousands of people swarm the streets to cheer on people they’ve never seen before, and will likely never see again; kids are off from school, and the entire city is in a good mood. There’s not a drop of animosity in the air: it’s the purest holiday and purest event in the entire city. And someone chose that day to make some statement, to hurt hundreds of innocent people. What started as a testament to human athletic endurance became a testament to the endurance of the human spirit.

A testament to the bravery of cops who grab their guns and headed towards the smoke, not away from it; to the student volunteers who expected to be treating road rash or blisters, and instead had to apply tourniquets; to nurses like my cousin, who had the day off but didn’t hesitate to report to their emergency rooms in the immediate aftermath of the bombings.

As the day went on, I felt similarly to how I felt as a eighth grader back on September 11th: the fear and confusion of not knowing what was going on, and not knowing what was going to happen next. People were claiming a bomb had gone off at the JFK Library, a report that turned out to be false, but a location that is mere minutes from my house. If 9/11 was the seminal moment of my elementary/high school years, unfortunately yesterday might be that moment for my mid-20′s. Sure, I’m hoping great things happen to me in the coming years, but nothing is going to replace that hollow feeling I had in my chest as I watched smoke rising off of Boylston Street.

Of Boylston Street. In Boston. My home.

I was discussing the events with my friend Bill, and we agreed that watching such events unfold at home was surreal. I walked down the other end of Boylston Street just a week ago, on a beautiful Saturday afternoon. I’ve gone in that CVS, scoffed at the people who go to Forum, wondered how rich I’d have to be to live in the Mandarin Oriental.

And someone decided that the people down there, people just like me, needed to be hurt and killed.

One of the best parts of Boston is that despite it being a pretty big city, it seems like everyone knows everyone. Everybody knows somebody who runs the Marathon, and as the day wore on, it started hitting closer to home: my cousin was a few blocks away, having walked further down Boylston minutes before the bombs went off; a friend’s girlfriend had been on the bleachers earlier that afternoon; friends had planned on going to the Marathon but changed their minds; family friends were in front of the Lenox Hotel across the street.

Finally, the tragedy hit my community hard: the eight-year-old boy who was murdered was from my home parish, St. Ann’s in Dorchester. I didn’t know the Richard family, but the boy was a Dorchester kid just like me. Martin Richard attended the same elementary school as I did, wore the same white suit when making his First Communion, and played at the same parks. His mother, who was seriously injured, frequented my mother’s work.

From what I’ve been told, he’s me: grew up in Dorchester, had two loving parents involved in every aspect of his life, had an older brother, and a younger sister. This morning, I saw a picture of him playing in a flag football league at the Garvey Park, a place I played as a kid.

This family, a working-class, community-oriented, loving family, was torn apart, and for what? For what? There’s no reason for this. No reason any of this needed to happen.

As yesterday came to a close, I, like most of you, grew weary of the constant coverage, yet couldn’t look away. I played my brother in NHL13, but didn’t feel like I should be having fun. I told my brother, sister, mother, and father that I loved them, something they all knew but that we all felt the need to confirm. The sense of sadness, of confusion, of fear, and even of guilt, knowing that these tragedies have happened elsewhere but haven’t had as much of a personal impact, lingered.

The city will bounce back, but everything will be different. Before the B’s canceled last night’s game, I told my brother I didn’t want to go anymore. He said the same, as did my father. Have we really reached the point where nowhere is safe? Office buildings, colleges, schools, buses, trains, planes, and now the Marathon?

Even as Tuesday marches on, the eerie feeling remains. As Bill said to me, we’re all trying to make sense of the new reality we’re living in.

Martin’s spirit will live on far longer than that of the cowards responsible for this, as will the spirits of the other two deceased. The city will rise up and support one another, neighbors comforting neighbors, strangers consoling strangers, because that’s what happens here. Boston itself is a contradiction: fiercely divided into proud neighborhoods, but just as fiercely united against outside threats.

I don’t know where the city goes from here, and truthfully, no one does. The hashtags and trending topics will eventually stop, as will the t-shirts and newspaper columns. But we’ll still be here, still be riding the T, still be hanging out at the Pru food court or bar hopping up and down Boylston. But now we’ll be looking over our shoulders, because someone attacked our home.

Nothing will ever be the same.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wrapping up the SoderSaga

After I left work on Saturday afternoon, I got a text from my brother. It was a picture of a Tweet from a Canadian reporter confirming that the NHL was disregarding the SIHF’s ruling and bringing Carl Soderberg to Boston anyways. Of course this all happens AFTER I step away from a computer.

So it appears that the SoderSaga is over: Soderberg will be here on Wednesday, that much has been confirmed. But what’s going on over in Sweden? Surely the SIHF isn’t going to take this lying down, and is probably pretty pissed off.

I headed back to Expressen.se one last time to see what’s been going on over there since the decision was announced on Saturday, armed with my trusty Swedish language skills (also known as Google Translate).

It appears that Mike Helber, the GM of Linkopings HC, played the role of “Good Guy GM” in this entire process. While his team stood to lose the most if Soderberg left Sweden, he didn’t put a single obstacle in his path.

Expressen ran an article under the headline “LHC never hesitated to break Carl’s agreement,” and in it Helber (an American from Michigan, first pointed out to me by Erik on Twitter, who actually played for LHC for a decade) offers details:

“What we really helped with is that Carl has asked us to break his contract on the 6th or 7th of April. We did that. Carl had a contract that ran until the end of April just like all contracts in Swedish hockey. He came to us and said, ‘I want you to break the contract with me. You don’t have to pay me anymore, because I want to play for the Boston Bruins.”

On Saturday, SIHF VP Peter Forsberg explained why Soderberg was leaving:

“We have been informed by NHL management that after reviewing the situation and having conversations with the NHLPA, they believe that Söderberg is not under contract and therefore cannot be stopped from NHL games.”

Forsberg went on to say that the NHL and its lawyers reviewed all of the details of the Soderberg case, and found that the SIHF had no grounds to block him from playing in the NHL. It was Bill Daly who informed the SIHF that the league was going to welcome Soderberg with open arms, a fact that disappointed Forsberg, who said:

“We have a unanimous board decision that we want to Carl Soderberg to honor his contract with the union now that coach Pär Mårts wants him on the World Cup team.”

It’s safe to say that Forsberg isn’t very happy about the proceedings, but he basically says that it’s clear that the this situation shows that the next transfer agreement between the two sides must clearly address instances like Soderberg’s.

Forsberg also wouldn’t comment on whether or not Soderberg would face Tre Kronor punishment (like being banned from playing on the national team) for defecting to the NHL.

On Monday, a bit more drama developed. It appears that the SIHF is considering taking action against Soderberg’s agent, JP Barry, and his agency, CAA Sports, which has an office in Sweden. The article is unclear (I guess the word “sued” is hard for Google Translate), but Samuel Linde on Twitter (he’s Swedish) says that legal action is indeed being threatened.

It appears that the SIHF is threatening to bar Barry from doing business in the country, as it can’t revoke the entire company’s license; each case must be reviewed individually.

Adding to the intrigue is the fact that apparently the Bruins tried to get Soderberg to come over in January (first pointed out by Samuel in the Tweet above). I went to Aftonbladet, another Swedish news site, and found an article confirming that the B’s did, in fact, attempt to get Soderberg to come over months back.

Apparently the B’s told LHC that they wanted Soderberg to come over, a request that Helber responded to with “outrage,” leading the Bruins to apologize. Soderberg apparently wanted to leave back in January as well, but Helber understandably blocked the move.

“Of course we reacted and wondered what they were doing over there?,” Helber told Aftonbladet. “How can anyone believe that we will be releasing SEL’s best player without getting anyone back?”

Helber goes on to say that the Bruins called to apologize, and that LHC made it clear back in January that they’d (at the very least) consider letting Soderberg walk when the season ended.

“We clearly showed our outrage and it ended with the Boston calling and apologizing. Even then, we made it clear that we could think of to break the contract with Carl when our season was over. So we did. It’s really the only thing that we helped with,” said Helber, who argued that there was never any doubt from the club’s side to break the contract early.

Interesting. Lawsuits, apology phone calls…very weird, which is fitting for this entire saga.

Thanks to Samuel, whose original Tweet inspired me to go back to Expressen/Aftonbladet. All quotes were paraphrased by me to sound better in English; I did my best to keep them accurate.

 

Posted in Transactions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Soder Saga: More from Sweden

The Carl Soderberg Saga continues to take its twists and turns, with yesterday being the wildest day yet. The Swedish Ice Hockey Federation blocked Soderberg’s transfer to the NHL yesterday after a meeting in Stockholm, insisting that he fulfill the remainder of this year’s SEL contract (until May 15th) by playing in the upcoming World Championships.

Mattias Ek, my email pal from Expressen.se, insisted to me earlier this week that this was the SIHF’s plan all along, contradicting reports from American media that the SIHF probably wouldn’t block it, that Soderberg to the Bruins was a done deal, and that Soderberg would be in Boston by this weekend. Looks like reporters overseas may do a bit more homework, but that’s neither here nor there.

Ek’s latest article in Expressen confirms recent Tweets by Dominic Tiano (who has been an ace in his coverage): Soderberg has told the SIHF that he has no interest in playing for Sweden in the World Championships.

From the article linked above:

“Carl Soderberg has declared himself or by the agent that he is not interested in playing in the World Cup,” says Tre Kronor general manager Tommy Boustedt. “Par (Mårts) talked to him last week and I’ve even seen the document which Carl has written and where it says that he does not want to play in the World Cup.”

Boustedt goes on to explain why they dismissed the transfer, saying that Swedish rules dictate that existing contracts run until May 15th, meaning Soderberg’s 2012-2013 deal with the Swedish Elite League is still valid for another month. The SIHF insists that this isn’t about the Soderberg case being special, but is about enforcing the rules for all players in similar situations. (If I misinterpreted the part about contract length, feel free to let me know).

When asked by Ek, Boustedt wouldn’t say whether or not Soderberg will be banned from Tre Kronor competition if he comes to Boston anyways, but did say “but definitely he breaks the rules. It’s that simple.”

Boustedt went on to insist that the ruling isn’t about Soderberg and is “sad” for him, but “at the same time our board has a responsibility to Swedish ice hockey because there’s something called precedent. It can get all dams to crack unless rules are followed,” i.e. changing the ruling once can open up the floodgates.

Paraphrasing the rest of the Google Translated article:

On whether or not Soderberg can still change his mind and play in the World Championships: “It’s more a question for him to answer than for us. But right now he has declared that he would not play. He has signed with the NHL. You can’t take on a player who says that he doesn’t want to play.” -Boustedt

On where the NHL stands on the matter: “Sweden is in negotiations with the NHL on a new NHL (transfer agreement) contract and neither the NHL or we want the negotiations to fail. Sweden is largest supplier of NHL players outside of North America and they want to have a good cooperation with us and we also believe in cooperation.” -Boustedt

On what happens next: “I suspect that Boston would like to proceed with this and we do not expect the matter been resolved, but we are awaiting what happens.” -Boustedt

So there you have it. My prediction? The SIHF backpedals by the end of this weekend, and Soderberg ends up being allowed to come here after all. The SIHF is already losing the battle of public opinion, as Erik Ecce shared a poll with me on Twitter where nearly 82% of Swedish respondents said the SIHF was wrong to block Soderberg’s deal, and has lost the player, as Ecce and others reported that Soderberg officially said he won’t play for Tre Kronor Friday afternoon.

The SIHF has nothing to gain here: they don’t have the support of Swedish hockey fans and they won’t have Soderberg in the line-up in Stockholm. My guess is that the Bill Daly and the NHL reach a gentlemen’s agreement of sorts with the SIHF: allow this transfer, and in the next agreement, we’ll include a clause that all players must honor existing contracts through May 15th. The SIHF will prevent the dam from bursting, so to speak, and the Bruins and Soderberg will get the outcome they want.

But hey, that’s just my opinion, and is 100% speculation on my part.

I reached out to Mattias again after yesterday’s news broke, and here’s what he had to say in an email:

“Yes, we knew this could happen and it did. Soderberg himself hasn’t said anything yet (as of Friday morning) nor his agents, other than that the NHL might reject the transfer to Bruins as well. It’s unfortunate for Soderberg to end up in this mess. A couple of months ago he was happy to play for Team Sweden in the upcoming Worlds, but the situation changed when Boston started discussing the move to the NHL already this season. If Soderberg would jump to the Bruins, ignoring the Swedish Ice Hockey Association, he would be banned from taking part in international tournaments in the future. I’m not sure he would risk that.”

So there you have it. This soap opera certainly isn’t over, but it gets weirder and weirder by the day.

Disclaimer: All quotes from Expressen.se were translated using Google Translate, so take that into consideration. I didn’t change any of them, except adding punctuation and correcting syntax when necessary. Same for Mattias’ email; the only things changed in that were punctuation and capitalization. For the paraphrasing, I took the translation and simplified it into better English, all while trying to keep the integrity of the original quote. Maybe I should just take a Swedish language lesson…

 

Posted in Transactions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Another Soderberg update

Disclaimer: Again, I don’t speak a word of Swedish, aside from Per Johan Axelsson. I’m transcribing and paraphrasing Google Translate here, so take the accuracy with a grain of salt. The only editing I’ve done to the quotes is to make them sound better grammatically in English (i.e. apostrophes, commas, etc.); otherwise they’re word-for-word.

Back to Google Translate!

After it was announced yesterday, first by the New England Hockey Journal’s Kirk Luedeke, then by everyone else, that the Bruins had agreed to a three-year contract with Carl Soderberg, the biggest looming question was “will the Swedish Ice Hockey Federation let him go?”

Media outlets here are reporting the Soderberg signing like it’s a done deal, and in a way, it is: Soderberg is going to end up in Boston. However, the big question is whether it’ll be next week or next season.

The potential objection by the SIHF has always been the biggest obstacle: signing the contract was pretty much a formality, as it was known that Soderberg wanted to come here, and the Bruins wanted Soderberg. However, the Swedish national team bigwigs, specifically GM Tommy Boustedt and coach Par Marts, want Soderberg to play for Sweden in the upcoming World Championships. It’s not hard to see why: Soderberg is regarded by many as the best Swede not in the NHL, as his 31 SEL goals this past season were the most scored by a player in five years.

Having basically set up camp on Expressen.se and Google Translate, I checked in again this morning to see what was up. The new article, written by Mattias Ek, starts by saying it’s clear that a contract and buyout has been agreed to by both the Bruins and Linkopings HC, though it cites NEHJ and ESPNBoston.com reports, which is strange, as one would figure that, being in Sweden, they’d do their own reporting.

However, the issue of Soderberg playing in the World Championships still looms large. Even some players currently in North America, most notably Calle Jarnkrok (whose name Google translates to the hilariously bad-ass Carl Iron Hook) and Jesper Fasth, apparently have pre-arranged agreements that they can leave their clubs April 15th and return to Sweden. Those two are in the AHL, so it’d be interesting to see if the call of country overrules potential Calder Cup playoff games.

As far as Soderberg’s participation goes, chairman Peter Forsberg (again, not Foppa) told Ek, “I have told the NHL when I was over there that Carl Soderberg is a key player for [Tre Kronor] in our home World Cup…he is not a marginal player.”

Ek goes on to say that the SIHF’s Board of Directors “will make a decision about Carl Söderberg’s NHL adventure later this week,” consistent with the Thursday meeting he told me about yesterday.

One of the issues appears to be the lack of a transfer agreement between the NHL and the SIHF, as one recently expired and a new one hasn’t gone into effect yet. From the article:

“We have no agreement today. We have the old agreement and [must] negotiate a new contract, so this comes in between. It also makes the situation a little funny because we do not know what governs either,” says Peter Forsberg. “You want both want common sense to prevail, but want each country to set up with their best player in a World Cup.”

Link to original version and translated version of Ek’s Expressen.se article.

Because I had already emailed Mattias before yesterday’s news of the alleged signing broke, I wanted to get his thoughts on all of the news, and whether or not he thought it was accurate. Here’s what he had to say on the matter:

I think that the media reports in the U.S. are probably accurate, but the federation over here claims that they have the right to prevent him from going. However, the pressure is on from the Bruins and the American media so we’ll see what the outcome of the meeting will be. My guess is that they will let Soderberg go if playing in the NHL right now is what he really wants. But the federation might as well persuade him to play for team Sweden in the Worlds if the coach Par Marts feels he’s in for a spot on the roster. It could go either way.

So there you have it, from someone who’s been covering the SEL for longer than anyone. Again, I’m not saying the reports are wrong, especially from Luedeke, who is a respected writer and very trusted source. I just wanted to get a perspective from the other side of the pond.

Either way, if what Ek says is accurate and playing in the NHL is what Soderberg really wants, it appears that the SIHF may let him go. However, as I said yesterday, I fear that the guilt trip may make Soderberg put off his North American excursion until after the World Championships; if that’s the case, we won’t see him until next season.

The good news? If the meeting tomorrow in Stockholm is indeed happening, we should be done with all of the speculation by tomorrow afternoon.

Posted in Transactions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment